Over the past couple of years regular readers have noted that I don't hold Canookies in all that high regard. It all started with a certain disrespect for Canadian whisky...
And I'm not alone in this.
Canadian Whisky is an oxymoron. Single Malts are pure, no additive works of art, and in many cases even sans caramel coloring, unfiltered and higher, richer proofs. Not to be ignored are Amercan bourbons, pure by definition, as are Mexican tequilas. And even rogue rum - which cheats - at least pretends to be pure, and some even are.
Not Canadian Whisky, which is allowed up to nearly 10% of anything - anything including wine - to be added to give it flavor. And which is still called rye whisky - legally - even if there's no rye in it. Seriously, a fauxed up spirit like this cannot be taken seriously. And as it turns out...
Neither can the Canookies.
It all started with the Frozen Furball, the Wolfboy, who actually started a rum review website with little previous knowledge of either rum or tasting! And who invented his own quirky "methodology", and proceeded to pump out faux "reviews" based on a highly questionable palate - a likely supertaster with bittermouth - and who found "bitterness" in over half the reviews examined. I could go on and one. Laughable, really, if there were only more credible rum websites on the net.
Part of his regimen seemed to be evaluating a rum with coke, a practice I found quite odd, but which I discovered is common practice among Canookies even with, or should I say often too with whisky. The Canookies are used to altered, pussified and easy drinking spirits which are really the Spam of Spirits, so in that light I suppose adding Coke is a plus.
I suppose.
And just when I thought it couldn't get worse...
Due to the Wolfboy, a small group of Canookies now call the Shillery home and to be honest, they're a perfect fit with the sycophantic, "...it's all good" monkeys. Recently a Canook from Montreal going by the name of "J" (no, not me) made this amazing post (exerpted)...
Is this amazingly stupid or what?"I... have been collecting rums and other bottles... since 1990. I cannot stand the taste of ANY alcohols... none the less I love to collect the stuff.
Love to read what people think about the contents of the bottles I own and it's helping me... with my collecting. For Example I regret buying Appleton 30 for 400$ when I can get Zacapa XO for 85$. I figured Appleton HAD to be fantastic at that price but ALL the critics I read on it grade it lower than Zacapa 23(never mind XO) and even cheap Havana Clubs. Same goes for my Diplomatico 12 which was 40$...
So I may not drink the stuff but truly do appreciate (what) people share... and hopefully will keep on learning more about bottles I own and ones I will want to own from reading posts.""
To collect some very expensive rums, not open or taste them, and then to regret the purchase based on what a few monkeys say? It's clear he's not collecting bottles per se, or he could collect them empty for far less expense. And it's not the rum for he doesn't even open or taste them. Nor can his "collection" be considered an investment.
It really does sound like thousands of dollars invested in this fakokte hobby. Can you imagine walking into this guys basement apartment, lined with hundreds of unopened bottles of rogue rum? I mean really now - though I can now understand why he doesn't collect truly expensive, top single malts.
No, what I believe he is collecting is recognition by consensus. He wants to own - not open or drink - rums that he believes are recommended by? By?? By the fackin monkeys fer gawds sake! And in this way gain the respect of these smelly simions? I can't imagine.
Only in Canada. Bitterness, coke and closed collections of others...