There's yeast and there's yeast Dept: Per Luis Ayala

For officers only! Relevent history and facts about the growing, harvesting, fermentation, distillation and aging of Cane Spirits. Master this section and you master rum. Otherwise just masterbate...
Post Reply
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

There's yeast and there's yeast Dept: Per Luis Ayala

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Take a quick look at thi, from a newletter I received today...

"The Congener Conundrum

One of the biggest misconceptions about congeners in rum is that quantity is a synonym of diversity. Thus, all “heavy” rums (rums with high congener contents) are or should be considered the same. The reality is that in the rum industry congeners are usually measured as the sum of heads, tails and acidity. Following this approach, a heads-strong and a tails-strong rum could have the same total congener content, but that does not mean both are equally good.

Heads-strong rums will have more aldehydes and esters, usually providing for sweeter, fruity complexity, while tails-strong rums usually have oilier, fuel-like attributes. I used the word “usually” twice in the prior sentence as a launching pad to help me with my next point: many alcohol distilleries catering to both fuel-grade and food-grade markets have been changing their fermentation methods to use only one yeast strain for both purposes. The strain is typically one selected for its ability to produce ethanol and very little else (under proper fermentation conditions).

While these distilleries are able to produce “heavy” rums by congener quantity alone, the heads congeners in these rums are mostly limited to acetaldehyde and ethyl acetate. There is nothing wrong with these two components, they are recognized throughout the world as common congeners found in rum. The only problem –and the raison d’etre of this article– is that once-common yeast strains, some that were not as efficient in producing ethanol alone, are falling in disuse for their fermentation “inefficiencies,” and by abandoning them we are also abandoning a diversity of other alcohol congeners and their derived aldehydes and esters.

Through our Rum University courses, we regularly show craft and large distillers the differences one can obtain using alternate yeasts acting on the same molasses. One of my favorite comparisons is pitting a yeast marketed by its producer as being specially designed to make light rum (with very low congener diversity) against a traditional Eau-de-vie yeast (brandy-like, high congener diversity). In both cases the distiller could adjust the heads and tails cuts to have a distillate with the same congener content, but in terms of congener diversity (particularly in the heads), there is no comparison at all.

I hope that as rum consumers become more educated about congeners they will encourage producers to return to heavier – and more complex– profiles.

Cheers,
Luis Ayala, Editor and Publisher
Rum Runner Press, Inc."
A lot of rum drinkers are not the least bit aware of these issues, although I suspect many of our regulars here do. Unfortunately the push for profit has led to big distillers using commercial yeasts designed for fast, high alcohol fermentations (for 24-48 hours), especially suited to their high production of industrially, column-produced thin rums, many very close to 94%. There's no real "there" there.

Compare to the independents who use wild or local yeasts, with much longer fermentations which are designed to maximize the congers available for the stilling and focused on the use of skilled batch pot-stilling where the master distiller decides just how much of the heads and tails to include with the hearts - in two runs and to notably lower percentages to retain far more tasty complexity.

The difference between these two approaches is truly like night and day. The latter is costly and time consuming (compare to single malt whisky) but worth every centivo...

Thanks to Luis Ayala, who well preceeded the Preacher, and who really knows his rum


*******
http://www.gotrum.com/editorials/from-t ... conundrum/
User avatar
jankdc
Cap'n
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:30 pm
Location: Cleveland

Post by jankdc »

This is truly where the small producers could actually make a difference. A 1.5 year aged rum with lots more flavor and complexity than an 8 year. What would a rum made with some Belgian ale yeast strain be like?
Rum Reviews Rankings and Cheat Sheet
References: MGXO, R Mat. GR, Scar Ibis, Apple 12, Barb 5, Pusser's, Wray and Neph, ED 15, 10Cn, West Plant, R Barc Imp.
Post Reply